I'm very curious as to why more people don't seek a chemical solution to this problem? For me, it was like a light going on when I stumbled across the theory that this was perhaps caused by a chemical imbalance, and could, as a result, be cured/fixed/alleviated by chemicals. As to whether that's true or not, I'll wait for the scienctist to determine, but certainly it's worked for me.
Granted, that may well be because I always choose the easier option, but given that so many people, a lot of whom would rate themselves as having willpower/determination/etc. try and fail to beat this on their own, why does it seem to me that medication is sometimes seen as 'cheating', or taking the easy way out? It is certainly not the first option that is considered. Is it still too early, or will this always be the case? I suspect that even if it is discovered that it's a medical condition, there will be those who insist it's a willpower/lifestyle choice (please note I'm not saying it is, one way or the other).
I have enormous respect for those who have beaten this unassisted. Personally, I tried and failed. With chemical assistance, I am finding it surprisingly easy to triumph. In fact, it doesn't feel like a victory, it feels more like the enemy has simply left the field.
There's still a lot that doesn't make sense to me regarding this. If it is a chemical imbalance, which to me seems to be the case, how does this account for those who triumph and live happy and productive lives without addressing the chemical side of this? The imbalance, if that is what it is, must still be there?
Sigh. Who knows? I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts.
Comment