Would the increase in the chance of possibility of failure have deterred you? Would you trade what you have now for what you had then? If not, I don't think it's right to be screaming it across the boards as if it were fact.
There is at least one poster here who would prefer not to have any discussions of SE's. I do not think it is responsible (or honest) to suppress these discussions because they might deter someone else. The more responsible (and honest) approach is to talk about it, and anything else that pops up along the way.
This forum does not exist for the purpose of promoting baclofen.
There is a mentality in some who post here that promoting baclofen should be the purpose of the people who post here. That's bullshit. That attitude really, really, really, really, really, really bugs me. It sets off a billion red flags, and makes me feel incredibly distrustful. If the history of this forum is any indication, there is no reason to be evangelically optimistic about baclofen. For a great many people, it has not worked - and THAT IS A FACT. For a comparably very few people, it has. That's the present reality.
Comment