Nice to see your progress, and that you've come down a bit from your high .
If I were a GP or a psychiatrist, knowing every published article and forum posts on BAC, I would not prescribe high-dose BAC for a patient.
Currently, the physics and chem Nobels require some high intellectual feat, but the Medicine prizes seem to alternate between scientific achievement and clinical importance. For example, the latest one went to the guy involved in the first in-vitro baby - a mostly technical deed.
Then there is the politics. One of the nominees I worked with (way back when) was the obvious choice (deservedly) for the field the Nobel Committee honored. But, his lobbying probably didn't endear himself to the voters, and I am sure his rude handling of his university's IRB (research committee) got back to the Nobel voters.
Even if BAC becomes the treatment of choice for alcoholism with a 95% success rate , Ameisen won't get a Nobel. He published one case report (about himself) and has not conducted any scientifically-relevant studies since. He certainly has the credibility to prescribe high-dose BAC to patients, but he has elected not to have a clinical practice. From the websites of Cornell and SUNY, it appears he no longer is a "professor" in either institution.
I'd much rather see a good treatment for me and all other alcoholics, Nobel or not.
Comment