Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

    A meta-discussion is a discussion once-removed from the topic. It is a discussion about the discussion, if you will. So, the discussion in this thread is off-topic, not about baclofen. It is about the discussion of baclofen.

    Baclofen is the only medication I?ve seen discussed on MWO that has been accompanied by decidedly hyper, curiously fervent, and sometimes dishonest behavior in order to promote that medication. What other meds have led to people pretending to be doctors? Have led to the creation of idols and enemies (even within the ranks: thinking of OA and his ?evil? designation of Levin here)? Have led to ?urgent? warnings about all the other meds? Have led to people posting here for the SOLE purpose of promoting that medication? Have led to a panacea mindset and crazy claims? Have led some people to feel suicidal? Have led others to feel abundantly powerful (not sobriety, the medication itself)? Have led to people OD?ing, withdrawing, and flat-lining in ER? Have resulted in people force-feeding other people that medication? Have led to people getting harmed and criminal and civil court cases ensuing? Not one. No other med ever discussed here has ever resulted in that kind of craziness.

    I do not know what it is, but something here just is not right. I am starting this discussion in the hopes that people might want to explore what that something(s) is. How much of it (the discussion itself), if any, is a physical reaction to baclofen itself? How much of it, if any, is due to an outside influence (not the average Joe trying to get sober ? something else)? How much of it is due to desperation feeding ardency? What all else might it be due to? Is there anything we can do to curb the dark side of this?

    So, to reiterate, this is NOT intended to be a discussion about baclofen itself. I am hoping that it will be a discussion about the discussion, about how and why the discussion presents as it does, and leads to the things that it leads to, if that makes any sense.

    #2
    A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

    TSM circa Summer and Fall of '09 would be a good parallel. When the hype died down it stood where it rests today--in it's rightful place as a viable option, and even a cure, for some people. Not nearly as many as Eskapa claimed (his book is very misleading).
    :nutso: I take pride in my humility :nutso:
    :what?:
    sigpic
    Graph of My Drinking From July '09 to January '10

    Consolidated Baclofen Information Thread




    Baclofen for Alcoholism and Other Addictions
    A Forum
    Trolls need not apply

    Comment


      #3
      A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

      Well, Winks or Tracy or whatever your name is

      This is not a discussion I want to be involved in except to say this. If you are talking about me then you have got your facts wrong. What has caused us problems is that hospitals don't admit people who are "alcoholics" so people are left to administer this medication on their own, at home. This is part of the problem with a new drug and a lazy and incompetent medical profession. The problems we had were as a result of having doctors who flatly refused to engage in this treatment and refused admission to hospital, out of prejudice, ignorance and arrogance, leaving someone who has a "brain" disorder untreated. You are one of the worst offenders here by making false statements about people force feeding drugs. What, at gunpoint? Grow up.

      You ask what is at the root of this. I'll tell you. Some of us realize that this is the only medication that, amongst all others, works. Some people suffering from alcoholism and its underlying cause are not as fortunate as you. They are not able to come on here and disparage others who want to find help with this illness before they die from it.

      Interesting isn't it that the examples you use are of people who went back to using Baclofen despite the issues you mention. Actually, no , it isn't that interesting. The only thing interesting here is a psychological issue. What would possess you to come here and start drawing people into a discussion about the reason for people coming here to get help when they find themselves in the most harrowing situations? Let's analyze them shall we? That's the help and compassion you bring here is it?

      Why not have a different discussion. What possesses people to come into a therapeutic community and start spreading false information, creating hysteria, dismissing a major development in medicine? Why don't you come clean about yourself? What is your motive here? Tell us all about you? Bare your soul to us? Tell us about yourself, warts and all, like some of us have here?

      What would make anyone here want to get involved in this kind of discussion with you, other than masochism? Because I am feeling enthusiastic about my future and the possibility of having the stigma of alcoholism lifted from our family for good, I will not be engaging in this thread and I would urge others to engage in threads which reflect the "ethos" of this forum which is to help those who want help so that we can all get to the next stage in the treatment of this illness.
      BACLOFENISTA

      baclofenuk.com

      http://www.theendofmyaddiction.org





      Olivier Ameisen

      In addiction, suppression of symptoms should suppress the disease altogether since addiction is, as he observed, a "symptom-driven disease". Of all "anticraving medications used in animals, only one - baclofen - has the unique property of suppressing the motivation to consume cocaine, heroin, alcohol, nicotine and d-amphetamine"

      Comment


        #4
        A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

        :welcome:

        HI TRACY

        :welcome:

        Comment


          #5
          A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

          lol
          BACLOFENISTA

          baclofenuk.com

          http://www.theendofmyaddiction.org





          Olivier Ameisen

          In addiction, suppression of symptoms should suppress the disease altogether since addiction is, as he observed, a "symptom-driven disease". Of all "anticraving medications used in animals, only one - baclofen - has the unique property of suppressing the motivation to consume cocaine, heroin, alcohol, nicotine and d-amphetamine"

          Comment


            #6
            A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

            Tracy in Disguise like Diamonds.....

            "It's not your job to like me, it's mine!"

            AF 10th May 2010
            NF 12th May 2010

            Comment


              #7
              A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

              one2many;1101682 wrote: Tracy in Disguise like Diamonds.....


              It was this post on another thread

              Winks wrote:
              Not a guy and on baclofen. Does that make me anti-me?
              That gave the game away. A woman, on Baclofen, who knows all the posters here. Old finger prints on the bloody candlestick there tracyA

              Comment


                #8
                A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

                Wow! Yes, it's Tracy. I was pretty sure EVERYBODY already knew that (did someone not?). Yes, it's the same Tracy who completely freaked out while watching the written account of a drunk person being force-fed baclofen.

                Yep, me.

                Anyway, I'm a nobody. I have no agenda. I am on baclofen at this moment. I'm not out to get anyone. I am very, very, very disturbed by things that have happened here and likewise disturbed by the incessant promotion of baclofen as something much more than what it actually is (never seen that kind of thing on MWO before).

                Anyway, I'll answer any personal question anybody wants, and some here have my real name, locale, phone number, whatever!

                I would really like the discussion to be about the discussion of baclofen. I note that the first post (not really the first - one was made and deleted) - right out of the stall - was defensive, attacking, obviously from someone who felt very threatened that such a "meta" discussion should even exist.

                The point of this thread is to talk about HOW we talk about baclofen and how that "discussion" affects people.

                It really should not be threatening to anyone.

                Comment


                  #9
                  A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

                  Winks;1101690 wrote:
                  Wow! Yes, it's Tracy. I was pretty sure EVERYBODY already knew that (did someone not?). Yes, it's the same Tracy who completely freaked out while watching the written account of a drunk person being force-fed baclofen.

                  Um? What?

                  Anyway, I'm a nobody. I have no agenda. I am on baclofen at this moment. I'm not out to get anyone. I am very, very, very disturbed by things that have happened here and likewise disturbed by the incessant promotion of baclofen as something much more than what it actually is (never seen that kind of thing on MWO before).

                  It really should not be threatening to anyone.
                  Then why the 3rd persona on this forum? Why change your name again.

                  zenstyles wrote:
                  Tracy... I'll bet if you did open up like Otter said that you'd get a lot of support on the meds threads. I've never seen anyone who was genuinely needing support and camaraderie, and offering the same in return, shunned on MWO. Maybe you should give it a shot and see what transpires? Just a thought...
                  Seriously tracy take that advice.

                  You seem to be a tremendously bitter person.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

                    Winks;1101506 wrote: A meta-discussion is a discussion once-removed from the topic. It is a discussion about the discussion, if you will. So, the discussion in this thread is off-topic, not about baclofen. It is about the discussion of baclofen.

                    Baclofen is the only medication I?ve seen discussed on MWO that has been accompanied by decidedly hyper, curiously fervent, and sometimes dishonest behavior in order to promote that medication. What other meds have led to people pretending to be doctors? Have led to the creation of idols and enemies (even within the ranks: thinking of OA and his ?evil? designation of Levin here)? Have led to ?urgent? warnings about all the other meds? Have led to people posting here for the SOLE purpose of promoting that medication? Have led to a panacea mindset and crazy claims? Have led some people to feel suicidal? Have led others to feel abundantly powerful (not sobriety, the medication itself)? Have led to people OD?ing, withdrawing, and flat-lining in ER? Have resulted in people force-feeding other people that medication? Have led to people getting harmed and criminal and civil court cases ensuing? Not one. No other med ever discussed here has ever resulted in that kind of craziness.

                    I do not know what it is, but something here just is not right. I am starting this discussion in the hopes that people might want to explore what that something(s) is. How much of it (the discussion itself), if any, is a physical reaction to baclofen itself? How much of it, if any, is due to an outside influence (not the average Joe trying to get sober ? something else)? How much of it is due to desperation feeding ardency? What all else might it be due to? Is there anything we can do to curb the dark side of this?

                    So, to reiterate, this is NOT intended to be a discussion about baclofen itself. I am hoping that it will be a discussion about the discussion, about how and why the discussion presents as it does, and leads to the things that it leads to, if that makes any sense.
                    You're a brilliant and gifted person Winks.
                    Very brave too.
                    There are quite a few of us who think that whatever it is " something here is just not right" ( it's gotten even much worse on the French forums in France)

                    And we're not the only ones to think there's somthing wrong.
                    A quote from DG on Ne's thread:
                    The speaker at an AA banquet I attended last weekend is a physician. He is in his 70's now and sober over 30 years. AL + Amphetamines nearly took him down. He has since done a lot of work to help other physicians who are addicted to drugs and/or alcohol and has also founded a program in his home town to help street people detox and have a real chance at sobriety. I wanted to ask him about bac when I "shook his hand" but there was really no time with so many people, etc. I was able to discover that he is aware of alcoholism treatment with high dose bac. All he was able to say before we had to move on was "it's scary.
                    " I have no idea what he meant by that.
                    Thanks for posting Winks.
                    Florie

                    Comment


                      #11
                      A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

                      Winks;1101506 wrote: A meta-discussion is a discussion once-removed from the topic. It is a discussion about the discussion, if you will. So, the discussion in this thread is off-topic, not about baclofen. It is about the discussion of baclofen.

                      Baclofen is the only medication I’ve seen discussed on MWO that has been accompanied by decidedly hyper, curiously fervent, and sometimes dishonest behavior in order to promote that medication. What other meds have led to people pretending to be doctors? Have led to the creation of idols and enemies (even within the ranks: thinking of OA and his “evil” designation of Levin here)? Have led to “urgent” warnings about all the other meds? Have led to people posting here for the SOLE purpose of promoting that medication? Have led to a panacea mindset and crazy claims? Have led some people to feel suicidal? Have led others to feel abundantly powerful (not sobriety, the medication itself)? Have led to people OD’ing, withdrawing, and flat-lining in ER? Have resulted in people force-feeding other people that medication? Have led to people getting harmed and criminal and civil court cases ensuing? Not one. No other med ever discussed here has ever resulted in that kind of craziness.

                      I do not know what it is, but something here just is not right. I am starting this discussion in the hopes that people might want to explore what that something(s) is. How much of it (the discussion itself), if any, is a physical reaction to baclofen itself? How much of it, if any, is due to an outside influence (not the average Joe trying to get sober – something else)? How much of it is due to desperation feeding ardency? What all else might it be due to? Is there anything we can do to curb the dark side of this?

                      So, to reiterate, this is NOT intended to be a discussion about baclofen itself. I am hoping that it will be a discussion about the discussion, about how and why the discussion presents as it does, and leads to the things that it leads to, if that makes any sense.
                      Where to begin with this? Taking baclofen does not give a person a license to be a predator. I'm sure in the case of Dr Phill, he already was. Most of what you state is regarding one person, Dr OA. I have no idea what is going on with him. He could have underlying mental illness. It is all conjecture. It will remain so. I don't blame him for not posting here at this point. I will guarantee, he feels someone has stole his thunder, Dr L here in the US.

                      Regarding withdrawing, we all know that this drug if taken in high enough doses, causes withdrawal if stopped abruptly. That is not new news. People that OD on it, do it on their own accord. There is no need to OD on this drug, if done properly. Flat lining in ER? I believe the flat lines occured in ICU, and that was after they took the drug in doses and titrations that were beyond my imagination. I can't remember these people's names, or I would look it up. I remember reading their admissions of how crazy their dosing and titrations were.

                      Otter's situation is unique. Again, you are talking about ONE person. Don't base a good part of your argument on one person.

                      If it doesn't "feel" right, stop taking it. You're still on the drug, so it must be doing something for you. Yes, a great many of us feel desperate. Desperate to save our lives, desperate to save our families. Sure, if it works, a passionate feeling will be created by the ones who use it. Why shouldn't it?
                      This Princess Saved Herself

                      Comment


                        #12
                        A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

                        Florieanne;1101695 wrote: You're a brilliant and gifted person Winks.
                        Very brave too.
                        There are quite a few of us who think that whatever it is " something here is just not right" ( it's gotten even much worse on the French forums in France)

                        And we're not the only ones to think there's somthing wrong.
                        A quote from DG on Ne's thread:


                        Thanks for posting Winks.
                        Florie
                        Florie,

                        You are basing your argument on what one doctor said at an AA meeting. So he said it was scary. Big deal. Anything is scary that is unknown. DG was never able to ask him more about his thoughts. Why are you trying to make this a foundation for debate?

                        There are a great many drugs that come with numerous side effects, but either save lives or increase the length and quality of one's life. Many have been considered unsafe or controversial. Here's some examples:

                        Antiretrovirals for HIV: particularly in pregnacy.

                        Lithium for bipolar: Yes, there's better, safer drugs, but sometimes this is the only drug that works.

                        MAOI's for depression: Again, same as above, but some people have to take them, it's the only thing that saves their lives.

                        Coreg: for heart failure.

                        INH: for Tuberculosis.

                        Prednisone: for autoimmune disorders.

                        Amphotericin B: for fungal infections.

                        Many, many chemo therapy drugs.

                        Just the start of what I can think of. Baclofen doesn't do nearly what some of these drugs do. And it saves lives. It's risk vs benefit. How important is it, for you to rid yourself of the beast? That becomes a question for all of us.

                        It is thought by my doctor, that one should stay at the switch dose for 18 months before titrating down. Is that considered that long term? I don't think so. If one can get down to the FDA approved dose of 80 mg (or close), and stay there, it is in all likeliness that they will not have too many long term effects. Either way, it is a risk I'm going to take.

                        I again want to ask all of you, how important it is to save yourself, save your family from watching you drink your life away? How hard are you going to fight for your life, work for a better one?

                        Florie, I read that you hit your switch. You were AF. You are now titrating off the drug, because you can't study 10 hours a day on it. Would it be prudent to put off school, until after you settle in? Is school not something you can put off, until after you have fully acheived sobriety? I too want to go back to school. My very lengthy application is complete, for the professional program I'm interested in. I'm in no way to sacrifice my sobriety for it. It's going to have to wait.

                        It's about time people put this all in perspective. Substance abuse is no joke. If one can get through it without a drug, then please do so. It is the preferable choice. If not, then do what you can. If it means taking mind altering drugs and acheiving success, then maybe it should be considered.
                        This Princess Saved Herself

                        Comment


                          #13
                          A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

                          Florieanne;1101695 wrote: You're a brilliant and gifted person Winks.
                          Very brave too.

                          Florie
                          I'll second that. Its a pity that with your gifts you still insist on deflecting your fury from yourself.

                          Zenstyle;1101687 wrote:
                          Tracy... I'll bet if you did open up like Otter said that you'd get a lot of support on the meds threads. I've never seen anyone who was genuinely needing support and camaraderie, and offering the same in return, shunned on MWO. Maybe you should give it a shot and see what transpires? Just a thought...
                          If you try, I'll try and fall into line.


                          And generally I'd like to second this sentiment as well:

                          redhead77;1101796 wrote:


                          I again want to ask all of you, how important it is to save yourself, save your family from watching you drink your life away? How hard are you going to fight for your life, for a better one?
                          Started Baclofen 3/9/10 Hit my switch at 250mg on 21/11/10 Present maintenance dose of 50mg : started drinking after 1 year, upped dose to 80mg and stopped: Tapered to 30mg, started 6 months of drinking, upped dose to 240mg to stop 12/7/12

                          Comment


                            #14
                            A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

                            redhead77;1101796 wrote: I again want to ask all of you, how important it is to save yourself, save your family from watching you drink your life away? How hard are you going to fight for your life, work for a better one?
                            Yes indeed. As pointed out, in many cases it's risk versus benefit with many medications. Many alcoholics don't have the luxury of sitting back and drinking for years and years more until something perfect comes along for them. A perfect treatment may never arise, or it may only come too late for many people. What about the many years of life wasted away as a person gets older while still living in an alcoholic fog? Some may not be lucky enough to live through the hell of drinking 10-15-25 or whatever drinks each day/night for years if they don't do something to try and stop or moderate.

                            If there were other treatments that baclofen-takers had not given a fair trial, and which had a half-decent success rate, then I'd say knock baclofen more and promote these other treatments instead. This is not the case however for most people who are trying baclofen. I really don't think many people would even be willing to put up with taking a drug that can have troublesome side effects if they knew of a better way out of their alcoholism!

                            Comment


                              #15
                              A Meta-Discussion on Baclofen

                              We also need to realise that Baclofen isn't going to be for everyone. I was told yesterday by a leading UK addiction expert that Baclofen isn't suitable for me, in fact it would be a waste of time and further misery with side effects if I were to continue.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X