I have no idea what the point of the link is, and unless you feel it's important, I don't really have time to read it all trying to figure it out. The point you were making (I think?) about what I posted is exactly my point about the study.
Irony, again!
If you read the information at Frontiers (as I did) you will see how papers are reviewed. It's very cool, because they post papers, and basically leave it to the online community to decide the value. So yes, it was reviewed to meet certain standards. But not the way research is reviewed in the traditional sense.
However, I realized I might have misunderstood what was written. 58 people stopped taking baclofen. 45 people discontinued treatment. Those are two different things. The numbers still don't make that much sense but I thought I'd offer that up as an explanation for that discrepancy.
My pre-dawn thought was to simply write Dr. de Beaurepaire and ask him the questions I have about the study. I don't know that I'll do that, but I bet he'd answer. (Especially if the letter happened to be in French.)
Cheers Colin. Hope it's a good day.
Comment