https://dl.dropbox.com/u/59463672/Ameisen%20Letter%20to%20the%20Editor.pdf
An obvious question arises here, which could one day be of relevance to those who are unable to tolerate high-dose baclofen for whatever reason. What would have happened if high doses of some of those other medications were tried for this purpose, instead of the standard doses used in each case. After all, Dr Ameisen makes the point that regular doses of baclofen itself do not act as a complete craving suppressor.
I guess this question is academic at this stage, and I am not for a minute suggesting that anyone else actually take abnormal doses of drugs as do-it-yourself treatment. However it is possible that other "hidden" treatments do exist in the form of high doses of other craving-reducing medicines, just as high-dose baclofen was an unknown treatment until Dr Ameisen himself took it on. Safety would of course be of paramount concern if anything was tried at high dosage, but the treatment we now call "high dose baclofen" remains well outside regular dosage guidelines, yet it is helping many.
I myself have experienced total removal of alcohol cravings with medium-high doses of benzodiazepines, but of course tolerance and addiction probably make such treatment too dangerous with that class of drugs. My point is, however, that high doses of a substance that isn't baclofen can and do completely remove alcohol cravings. One study on Campral (in rats I think) found a dose-dependent craving reduction effect that (from memory) ended up as a complete craving removal at high doses. Anticonvulsants are often mentioned as potential treatments for alcohol dependence, and if any were safe to use at high dosage, they too could have such an effect.
As I said, I only raise this as a topic to think about, not for anyone to try.
Comment