The point being, that if we look at baclofen as a treatment for "alcoholism" but alcoholism is merely a misdescription of a neurological problem, then we are saying that baclofen is a cure for a non-existent disease. Alcohol is merely a crude treatment for the illness, and consumption of alcohol is a "symptom" or result of the illness, and you can't "cure" a symptom.
What then happens when you have so say cured yourself of alcoholism or you think you have because you are no longer drinking?
Around this circle the talk is about then "tapering off" and there is a lot of thinking going on about whether one can taper off or whether this is a life long condition.
My own view is that there is an underlying condition and that it is this condition, call it Gaba-b dysphoria if you want, which is being treated with baclofen. Imagine, for instance, that there is a deficiency in this area, some damage or a missing chemical. Once you stop drinking because you have supplemented this missing chemical with baclofen, then does this actually cure the underlying problem. I don't think it does and I see that as a problem in tapering off or coming off completely because you feel you have beaten "alcoholism" once you stop drinking.
My take on it is that baclofen is also an anxiolytic. It treats an ongoing condition, such as restless leg syndrome, and you can get a prescription for it for that ailment, as Ameisen found out. So, even if you have stopped drinking you need to look at whether you still have a problem and how best to treat it. At that point, do you continue with baclofen at low dose, as and when needed, or regularly, or switch to some other anxiolytic?
I don't know the answer to that and there are perhaps not enough people who have been on baclofen under the supervision of a doctor for this to be something which we will get any answer in the short or medium term.
I am just throwing this out there for any comments.
Comment