R2C: In the meetings I go to, there is sometimes a line in the preamble warning against "crosstalk" (i.e. referring to another person by name). I try to keep the Tradition (not sure which one) of "keeping principles above personalities" in mind. That's why crosstalk is frowned upon. That said: some of the groups I go to are pretty loose & there's crosstalk galore. If I really want to refer to what someone else said, I'll sometimes refer to that person as "a previous speaker." I've heard that pretty frequently. Some meetings are stricter about rules than others. Also, I've heard in preambles warnings against advice-giving. It's suggested that we stick to our own experience. I hope all this formality doesn't put people off to AA. These rules are for our own protection...so that resentments or hurt feelings don't occur. I'm sure you were probably a little embarrassed or chagrined, but I know that the positives or AA far, far outweigh anything I might deem as a negative. Good luck.
Last night's "burning desire" meeting was wonderful. So much feeling & emotion. To me, it's unique.
Phil: I see a lot of drug addicts (& cross addicts) at our AA meetings. I know there's an NA meeting in the area, but there are far more AA meetings. As far as I'm concerned, addicts are addicts, whether it's a drug or alcohol...it's still a mood-altering substance.
Mary
Comment